In partnership with

GM. This is Needs to Exist (aka NTE), delivering you a startup idea that fixes prisons by fixing incentives.

6,500 ideas later, NTE Pro is where the ones you can’t unsee live → click if you build.

WhoFiled shows you companies before decks, hype, and consensus, follow the signals, not the noise.

Check out all the past newsletters here

Here’s what we’ve got for you today.

• Daily Idea - Pay For Freedom

• Incentive Courtroom

Pay For Freedom, Not Cells

The One Liner

Pay prisons for freedom, not cages

The 140 character tweet (or X) version

What if prisons only got paid when people stayed free after release? Nonprofits, incentives flipped, rehab over beds outcomes over beds ok.

The Longer Story Version

The Problem

Prison reform keeps arguing morals while ignoring math.
The system says “rehabilitation,” but pays for bodies in beds.
Private prisons win on occupancy. Public prisons survive on budgets.
Recidivism isn’t a failure, it’s baked into the incentives.

We’ve accidentally built an industry that performs best when people come back.

If you were designing this from scratch, you’d never pay someone for repeat customers here. And yet… we do.

The Solution

Flip the incentive. Completely.

Prisons operate as non-profits.
The government doesn’t pay for incarceration, it pays for outcomes.

Payment only happens after:
• a sentence is completed
• the person stays out of prison for a defined window (say 2–5 years)

Now the prison’s job changes overnight.

Education, job placement, mental health support, addiction treatment, these aren’t “nice to have.” They’re revenue drivers.

Prisons stop being detention warehouses and become rehabilitation companies whose survival depends on people not coming back.

Same infrastructure. Same staff. Entirely different motivation.

How We’d Build It

Phase 1: Prove the incentive works
• Pilot with low-to-medium risk offenders in one state or city
• Outcome tracking using existing justice + employment data
• Manual ops + dashboards built with Retool or Glide
• Third-party auditors to verify outcomes
• Vibe-coded internal tools to track cohorts, milestones, and payments

Goal: show recidivism drops when payment is delayed and conditional

Phase 2: Productize outcomes
• Standardize outcome metrics (employment, stability, reoffense)
• Simple reporting layer for governments
• Automated data ingestion from labor, health, and justice systems
• Case management workflows for prison staff

Goal: make “rehabilitation ROI” legible and defensible

Phase 3: Scale the model
• Multi-state expansion
• Outcome-backed financing for upfront costs
• Clear rules to prevent cherry-picking easy cases
• Benchmarking prisons against each other on success, not size

Goal: outcomes become the competitive advantage

Why It Needs to Exist
Mass incarceration is financially unsustainable.
States want lower costs without looking “soft.”
Results-based government spending is finally acceptable.
Data systems now exist to track long-term outcomes.
Public trust in the current prison model is collapsing.

This reframes prison reform from a moral shouting match into an incentive fix.

Not “be nicer.”
Not “spend more.”
Just: stop paying for failure.

And once you see it that way, it’s hard to unsee.

The Tech newsletter for Engineers who want to stay ahead

Tech moves fast, but you're still playing catch-up?

That's exactly why 100K+ engineers working at Google, Meta, and Apple read The Code twice a week.

Here's what you get:

• Curated tech news that shapes your career - Filtered from thousands of sources so you know what's coming 6 months early.

• Practical resources you can use immediately - Real tutorials and tools that solve actual engineering problems.

• Research papers and insights decoded - We break down complex tech so you understand what matters.

All delivered twice a week in just 2 short emails.

Join 100K+ engineers

The Incentive Courtroom

Today’s case: The People vs. Paying Prisons for Rehabilitation.

Not inmates. Not wardens.
The incentive model itself is on trial.

The Prosecutor opens fast.
“This will be gamed immediately. You pay on post-release success, prisons will cherry-pick easy cases, dump the hard ones, and pad outcomes. We’ve seen this movie before. Metrics become targets. Targets get hacked.”

The Defense doesn’t deny it.
“Correct. And every prison incentive today is worse. Right now we literally pay for failure. Occupancy is revenue. Recidivism is a rounding error. If gaming is inevitable, at least aim it at the right outcome.”

The Judge interrupts. No patience for philosophy.
“Numbers. What’s the delta? Cost per inmate today vs. cost per inmate who doesn’t come back. Show me budgets. Show me downside.”

Enter the Economist.
“False negatives matter. One reoffense can erase years of savings. But we already accept that risk silently. We just don’t price it. This forces us to.”

Former Warden takes the stand.
“You want honesty? Guards don’t control incentives — budgets do. If my funding depended on job placement instead of headcount, my staff training, vendors, and daily routines would change overnight.”

The Prosecutor jumps in.
“So we’re shifting risk to communities while prisons wait for delayed payouts?”

Ex-Inmate responds before the Defense can.
“Communities already carry that risk. The difference is no one gets paid today to reduce it.”

State Budget Analyst closes the loop.
“Delayed payment isn’t cruelty. It’s accountability. Governments already prepay for outcomes they never verify. This at least ties money to reality.”

The Judge leans back.
“So the question isn’t ‘can this be gamed?’ Everything is.
It’s ‘is this less broken than what we have?’”

No verdict today.

Just an uncomfortable realization:
The system we’re defending already picked a side.

And it wasn’t rehabilitation.

NTE Pro is where unfinished thoughts turn into unfair advantages.

Inside right now:
• A tool that spots founders about to quit their jobs before they tell anyone
• A marketplace that lets companies buy demand before customers know they want it
• A data product that finds acquisition targets hiding inside “boring” local businesses

These aren’t packaged startups. They’re raw pressure points.
You’re meant to poke them, remix them, and argue with them until something clicks.

6,500+ ideas built to expand your thinking, not hand you answers.
Sign Up For NTE Pro

WhoFiled Pro is how you stop chasing startups and start seeing them early.

You don’t get alerts. You get a personalized digest built around your theses. Funding filings, new entities, technical signals, Reddit and Hacker News traction, Product Hunt launches, quiet M&A moves, all filtered for what actually matters to you.

No scrolling. No guessing. No hype cycles.

Just a living feed of companies forming, shipping, and moving before they’re “a thing.”

Upload your own pipeline, track it automatically, and let the signals come to you.

WhoFiled Pro is free for a limited time. Sign Up Today

One More Meme

Someone just spent $236,000,000 on a painting. Here’s why it matters for your wallet.

The WSJ just reported the highest price ever paid for modern art at auction.

While equities, gold, bitcoin hover near highs, the art market is showing signs of early recovery after one of the longest downturns since the 1990s.

Here’s where it gets interesting→

Each investing environment is unique, but after the dot com crash, contemporary and post-war art grew ~24% a year for a decade, and after 2008, it grew ~11% annually for 12 years.*

Overall, the segment has outpaced the S&P by 15 percent with near-zero correlation from 1995 to 2025.

Now, Masterworks lets you invest in shares of artworks featuring legends like Banksy, Basquiat, and Picasso. Since 2019, investors have deployed $1.25 billion across 500+ artworks.

Masterworks has sold 25 works with net annualized returns like 14.6%, 17.6%, and 17.8%.

Shares can sell quickly, but my subscribers skip the waitlist:

Skip waitlist

_{*Per Masterworks data. Investing involves risk. Past performance not indicative of future returns. Important Reg A disclosures: masterworks.com/cd}